High on Fire
Snakes for the Divine


3.5
great

Review

by GnarlyShillelagh USER (40 Reviews)
February 28th, 2010 | 105 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Snakes for the Divine is a very focused album, and is proof that High on Fire is ready to become a true mastodon on the metal scene.

After 2007’s Death is this Communion, it was evident that High on Fire had matured to the point at which they could have taken one of two paths for their next album. On the one hand, their use of the opaque and thunderous riffs that are found predominantly on Post-Metal albums was a good indicator that the band could propel themselves into the realm of Post-Metal with relative ease. But the album was as much an exhibit of their technical proficiency as it was one of the dense sound with which a lot of bands employing low tuned guitars are experimenting. And while Matt Pike’s guitar prowess wasn’t a primary component of the music, it was utilized enough to exemplify that if they wanted to, High on Fire could continue to attune their sound to one in a similar vein as their arguably most relevant contemporaries: Mastodon.

But unlike Mastodon, who is often unjustifiably dubbed a sludge band, that very element has always been prominent in High on Fire’s music. And despite balancing the aforementioned sounds to form a more cohesive album, the sludge aspect is still just as prevalent as ever. In fact, probably moreso than on Death, which paid more attention to the musicianship than the atmosphere that the sludge sound tends to elicit. On Snakes for the Divine, High on Fire weaves these elements together in order to create a more coherent and focused album.

A few things are noticeably different in High on Fire’s sound almost instantly. The production has definitely improved, although it is still far from perfect. The bass is perpetually audible, and the opening sequence in the title track is crisp, an indicator of the solid sound quality. The only gripe people will have with the production is that although certain aspects of it are better, the album still doesn’t sound like one that came out of 2010. The vocals, too, seem to have taken steps in the right direction. On Death, Pike’s vocals often sounded insipid and uninspired, rarely changing in power and inflection. Snakes showcases a more incisive and blustery vocal performance; Pike’s voice has clearly stepped out of the shadow of the other instruments on many of the songs, and his maturity is accompanied by the evolution of the other instruments as well.

Matt Pike has added more variety in his fretwork, “Fire, Flood, & Plague” throwing in a thrashy component at the beginning, before settling right into a strong riff for the rest of the song. There are more solos on Snakes, which although detract a bit from the sludgy aspect of the songs, are never unwelcome features of the music. Des Kensel’s drums are well done as well, never overpowering but never underwhelming either. And it’s interesting to see a drummer in today’s metal scene who doesn’t utilize much double bass either. That isn’t to say that the bass drum is unutilized; it just isn‘t exploited to the extent that it is on many metal records, and his modest performance is sublime.

With regards to the dilemma presented in the opening paragraph, High on Fire drew on elements of both sounds for the new album. Using the sound from Death is this Communion as a foundation, the band carefully and intricately crafted an album that has really developed their own sound. Without compromising the sound that many found pleasing on their last album, High on Fire made a return to their roots, reviving the sludgy sound that they were always known for. Snakes for the Divine is a very focused album, and is proof that High on Fire is ready to become a true mastodon on the metal scene.



Recent reviews by this author
Drake and Future What a Time to Be AliveT.I. Da' Nic
Raekwon Fly International Luxurious ArtRun the Jewels Run the Jewels 2
Logic Under PressureIceage Plowing into the Field of Love
user ratings (605)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
REUS (4)
There is absolutely no chance of Sleep while listening to this monolithic slab of molten metal....

Professor (4)
High On Inspiration...

Bleekill (4)
The legends of their craft, the mighty riff, do not disappoint. Even more aggressive than previous w...



Comments:Add a Comment 
GnarlyShillelagh
February 28th 2010


6385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Pretty good album; much better than Death is this Communion.



As for the review, I don't really like it, but maybe you will.



And by maybe, I of course mean "I hope"

Prophet178
February 28th 2010


6397 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I had to stop after the second paragraph cause I'm raging so hard after reading it.

Ulsufyring
February 28th 2010


1748 Comments


please stop saying these guys sound like mastodon, it makes me think you're retarded

americanohno
February 28th 2010


2177 Comments


not as good as sputnikdog's review- neg!

jk good review I like 'death is this communion'- pos!

GnarlyShillelagh
February 28th 2010


6385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

To me, DitC sounded so much like Mastodon, particularly in the vocals. That was the primary comparison I was making.

Ulsufyring
February 28th 2010


1748 Comments


yeah, but

mastodon is bad

and no it didn't wtf


Relinquished
February 28th 2010


49071 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

the mastodon now sucks

Prophet178
February 28th 2010


6397 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Alright, 1) Since when is Mastodon classified as sludge? Maybe back in '03 when they released Remission and 2) How can you compare Crack The Skye to anything High on Fire have done?



The whole Mastodon comparison is ridiculous and takes up half your review.

GnarlyShillelagh
February 28th 2010


6385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Ulsufyring: I agree 100%. I feel like Mastodon is a shit band too.



And the vocals were really similar at a lot of places.

charles2000
February 28th 2010


450 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

those are some bad recs and mastodon rules gtfo ulsulfag

americanohno
February 28th 2010


2177 Comments


dnt be mean guys not all reviews can't be enlightening and perfect and beautiful as sputnikdog's review

Blindsided
February 28th 2010


1871 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Review is lacking.

Ulsufyring
February 28th 2010


1748 Comments


charles bro i thought we wer bros but bro i see it's not like that anymore, bro

charles2000
February 28th 2010


450 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

head esplodes

Ulsufyring
February 28th 2010


1748 Comments


bro i can't have a bromance with only one bro D:

GnarlyShillelagh
February 28th 2010


6385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Who is sputnikdog?



Charles: I initially was just going to rec Hymn to the Immortal Wind on all four places but I

thought people would get mad so I put those two instead. Whatever, I'll remove them.



Prophet: Hence, "unjustifiably".



And CtS doesn't sound like anything HoF has done, but at the same time, your comment is very

subjective. You have CtS as a 4.5, while I have it at like a 2.5. So I obviously think this is a

better album.



Regardless, I understand the point you're making. What do you want me to do about it?



Blindsided: Lacking in what, exactly?

Ulsufyring
February 28th 2010


1748 Comments


you know i haven't been able to sleep well for awhile, i might go see the mastodon/btbam/baroness show coming up

GnarlyShillelagh
February 28th 2010


6385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Don't CtS/TGM/Blue all sucked

americanohno
February 28th 2010


2177 Comments


"Who is sputnikdog?"

he reviewed this album entirely in dog language ('barks!', 'grrrs!', et al)

Phantom
February 28th 2010


9010 Comments


also known as a shitty, shortlived alt who made no impact on the site



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy