Daughters
Daughters


5.0
classic

Review

by Zettel USER (47 Reviews)
March 25th, 2010 | 29 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Hell, yeah!!

In ten years people will talk on this album as they talk today about Converge's Jane Doe. Probably in less time bands will be ripping them off as they rip off The Dillinger Escape Plan or Botch. Daughters will have a cult following, and when you heard some band sounding like them, you will say: Mmm...they sound like Daughters. Don't you know them?. This album is so groundbreaking to my ears.

Noisy, heavy, unique, interesting, exciting, with a well defined personality, Daughters is the kind of album you do not know what to make of on first listen, and yet you are intrigued and keep listening. For several times. Labels as grind, mathcore, noise rock, experimental are inaccurate. It may sound familiar, some parallels could be drawn, but in the end what you hear sounds new. They do not sound like anything else. One rarely has the chance to hear something that has not been done before. Were not for The Smashing Pumpkins, My Bloody's Valentine's Loveless would have entirely disconcerted more people that it did. When The Dillinger Escape Plan released Calculating Infinity people did not know what they were hearing; it was mind-blowing to some, utter garbage to others. The same thing probably will happen to Daughters.

From the instant "The Virgin" starts, you are welcome to a new kind of noise barrage that will define the entire album. Guitars sounding like they were melting underwater through a microphone, strange noises like steel sparkles assaulting your ears raising the cacophony to new exciting levels, with an unmistakable vocal performance rounding the piece, all create a distinctive noise aesthetic, which sets itself apart from anything else. It is the musical equivalent to a war ambush; it is not fair game. It is not the heaviest thing you will hear or the most technical, but rarely such a massive noise can be fun and enjoyable, while intriguing and creative at the same time. Yes, the album is maniacal and friendly, in a way it is virtually irresistible. It reminds you rock is indeed alive, urgent and chaotic, and in its particular way it celebrates life. No time for reflection or contemplation: "we are here, right now. Live!”

Daugherts tries to emulate the effect of a Red Bull. Its particular amalgam of metal, punk, industrial and noise is energy-injecting, and is effective throughout its 28 minutes. Naturally, the album has a overall similar tone, but that is not to say there is no variation and it all blends together. Every song is recognizable, even if based on the same basic principles. Daughters know how to use their musical assets to get the maximum benefits, resulting in a truly excellent album that is far from linear and predictable; it is crushing with a sense of groove. Clearly, there is a novelty factor in here working against the album. It does not matter. Even if at some point its impact wears off, you still will have great devastating songs that are ultimately fun to listen to.

If you are tired of hearing variations of the same thing, it will not hurt giving this a chance. Daughters are doing something really refreshing and exciting, a sound from which future bands could summon some inspiration.


5/5



Recent reviews by this author
Kane Ikin Modern PressureLogan Takahashi NoGeo
Beyonce LemonadeKaty B Honey
Kane Ikin SublunarOrson Hentschel Feed The Tape
user ratings (934)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Comatorium.
March 25th 2010


5046 Comments


so this told me nothing about the music.

HighandDriving
March 25th 2010


3288 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's like Redbull, you get it?



Any review kiddies here see a strong Melt Banana influence on this, no one has seem to addressed it yet.

sniper
March 25th 2010


19075 Comments


Sorry, but will never be a Jane Doe. Won't neg but focus more on sound than effect next time.

sniper
March 25th 2010


19075 Comments


EDIT: fuckin double posts...

luci
March 25th 2010


12844 Comments


In ten years people will talk on this album as they talk today about Converge's Jane Doe.

No.

Romulus
March 25th 2010


9109 Comments


I like this better than Jane Doe just sayin

sniper
March 25th 2010


19075 Comments


But come on, it will never have the impact of Jane Doe.

ov420
March 25th 2010


300 Comments


yea cmon

Romulus
March 25th 2010


9109 Comments


Completely agreed there just throwing out my 2 cents

HighandDriving
March 25th 2010


3288 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Jane Doe will never have the impact of any of Botch's albums.





Zettel
March 25th 2010


661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Sorry, but will never be a Jane Doe. Won't neg but focus more on sound than effect next time.



Hi, Sniper. Normally, I would agree with you. Sometimes, though, the sound is tightly bounded to the effect, to the point they are inseparable. For instance, focusing only on Jane Doe's sound would be render the album merely interesting; it is only half the story, and certainly not the more interesting. It does not explain the impact.



The great and more intersting thing about Daughters is that you really have to hear it for yourself. My intention was not a dissection of the album's sound, but the reason why overall is such a compelling listen. The purpose is to pick your interest for you to decide, nothing more.



Honestly it bugs me to read you can not find a description of the music on the review. The sound is intentionally sketched for you to complete the picture. Sorry if that is not enough.



Thanks for the comments.



iarescientists
March 25th 2010


5865 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

trying to forsee how an album will be remembered in 5 years is always a bad idea



just take it for what it is not what it will be



dont try to force a classic

Zettel
March 25th 2010


661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Iare:



You are absolutely right. I know. And still I did it. It is clearly my opinion (so no, I am not forcing anything), and it is okay if it turns out to be wrong. Comment appreciated.

sniper
March 25th 2010


19075 Comments


You at least backed up your 5, so that's good, and the writing itself wasn't bad, you just made a lot of huge speculations for my taste. And to a degree I think you're right about impact vs. sound but I think this album is far too recent to need that kind of "important album" connotation already.

PirateSquid
March 25th 2010


1881 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I love this album so much too. Better than Option Paralysis.



But you actually need to talk about the music

Zettel
March 25th 2010


661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Pirate:



I do not want to keep talking over the same thing, but I feel you are all honest about the lacking of description of the sound. But, seriously:



"Its particular amalgam of metal, punk, industrial and noise "



"Labels as grind, mathcore, noise rock, experimental are inaccurate"



"From the instant "The Virgin" starts, you are welcome to a new kind of noise barrage that will define the entire album."



I mean, connect the dots. It is an overview, and the stress is on the unique sound, so I am not interested in defining it, and probably I would not do a good job at it.

ov420
March 25th 2010


300 Comments


hey

SeaAnemone
March 25th 2010


21429 Comments


In ten years people will talk on this album as they talk today about Converge's Jane Doe.

It's been said before, but this is too presumptuous for a review.

This album is so groundbreaking to my ears.

Just because it's groundbreaking to your ears doesn't mean it's groundbreaking. I can't tell if you're trying to say "this is unlike anything I've heard" or "this is unlike anything else out there"

you ears *your

For several times.

not a sentence

The same thing probably will happen to Daughters.

once again, concentrate on the music, not what you think will happen to it or how people will receive it


3rd paragraph is easily the best here... try to expand more upon that next time.






AliW1993
March 25th 2010


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Like people have said, the writing here is good its just a little too presumptious. Only bought this yesterday but Im loving it so far, doubt it'll ever be a 5 for me though.

OceanOfWisdom
March 25th 2010


99 Comments


I agree with SeaAnemone

Try not to focus too much on convincing people that this is a 5. Rather than simply trying to focus on getting others to look into it themselves so-to-speak.

People already read these reviews under the assumption that the majority of the review is based largely on your personal opinions (though it does seem to be reiterated a lot..lol), so by being more descriptive of key elements of the actual instrumentation can often sway people on wether or not they themselves should listen to it...Just saying



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy