Daughters
Daughters


2.5
average

Review

by Plutonio USER (18 Reviews)
March 25th, 2010 | 44 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Daughters is a record infused with maturity, but not with excitement.

Every once and a while, one comes across a band whose sound seems to be set up for failure and nothing else. However, this band clearly surpasses one's expectations and churns out an unexpectedly enjoyable release. Recently, Daughters proved that they were ready to join the league of said bands. With 2003's Canada Songs, Daughters excelled at their craft with their inane, schizophrenic nature. Showing a disregard for taste and structure, their sound was above and beyond that of their contemporaries. Daughters furthered the sound established by their debut with Hell Songs. Riddled with vanguard vocal stylings and intriguing song structures, Daughters's sophomore release perpetuated their well-established abrasiveness. Yet, it became clear with this release that Daughters were maturing and expanding their sound. Their sophomore effort touched upon many genres and was more focused than their debut. In time, Daughters's metamorphosis would be complete. Their eponymous album is the proof of their transformation.

Daughters builds itself off of the abrasiveness found within the riffs of Canada Songs and the original forms of sonic slaughter secured within Hell Songs. The apparent result of this combination is a far more refined release from the little Providence-based group. The potential Daughters acquired during the making of this release is tremendous; yet Daughters is a regression in almost every other way. Poor songwriting riddles this album, and excitement is rare.

Case in point: “The Virgin” shows off some technical flair, but the track is monotonous and never climaxes; nor does it make full use of its components. Fugues of noise and angular dissonance are executed haphazardly on said opener and the tedious sixth track. The same applies to the noisy “Sweet Georgia Bloom”. Perpetuating intensity ensues, but has a rather measly end. And even when a climax is worthy, Daughters perpetuate boredom for far too long for said climax to meet its fullest potential (see: “The Unattractive Portable Head”). The glaring flaw of poor songwriting is the most palpable of drawbacks on this album, but its reach cannot affect other aspects of the album.

Technicality is one of Daughters's strong points. Tremolo plucks run rampant, and when used effectively, the resulting angular dissonance adds substance and intensity to the album. Seen most clearly on “Our Queens (One Is Many, Many Is One”, said technicality is manifested within quaint time signatures and boisterous flurries of notes. Another one of Daughters's successes is the eclecticism throughout. Granted, most of the album's sound is chaotic, alternating between sounds akin to mathcore and that of grind. Still, Daughters have fused their sound with electronic music, punk jazz, and vocal styles of the vanguard. “The Theater Goer”, one of the album's strongest tracks, dabbles in everything from noise to metal to hardcore in a coherent way. Daughters dabbles in a broad range of hardcore variants on “Our Queens (One Is Many, Many Is One”. The fourth and fifth tracks show Daughters's potential in all its discordant glory. It's a shame that all the potential that Daughters tithe is squandered by poor songwriting. With a bit more refinement Daughters will be seen as the framework to Daughters's evolution. If the potential held within Daughters's eponymous album equates to their future, it's an evolution worth the wait.



Recent reviews by this author
Black Veil Brides We Stitch These WoundsLindstrom and Christabelle Real Life Is No Cool
We Are The World Clay StonesAnimal Collective Fall Be Kind
Circa Survive Blue Sky NoiseErykah Badu New Amerykah Part Two: Return of the Ankh
user ratings (940)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Zipzop5565
March 26th 2010


402 Comments


Why are there no daughters in this band?

NeutralThunder12
March 26th 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

THANK YOU. The record has some unique aspects, but just is kind of stupid and flat out fails at attempting to be different in a good way, because it is different, but it's just so dumb.

cvlts
March 26th 2010


9943 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I agree with this.



Heavy and interesting as fuck. But kinda boring.

Plutonio
March 26th 2010


474 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

I thought I was the only one. Although there are only a few interesting parts that aren't repeated over and over again or downplayed.

cvlts
March 26th 2010


9943 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

interesting take on the genre. not ideas.

eternium
March 26th 2010


16358 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You guys ARE the only ones. This isn't boring.

TheWayfarerElectric
March 26th 2010


154 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I think it's boring.

Edwin
March 26th 2010


1399 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't think it's boring.

GibTG
March 26th 2010


284 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Put down the thesaurus.



And their is nothing mature about a daughters album.

DivinityOfPan
March 26th 2010


85 Comments


^^troll

GibTG
March 26th 2010


284 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I'm far from a troll, just didn't like the review.

Plutonio
March 26th 2010


474 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Are there any sentences that read awkwardly. And about the maturity thing... for a grind album, it is.

GibTG
March 26th 2010


284 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I will give you that compared to grind, it is mature, but you didn't specify.



The first paragraph is pretty darn good except for the first and last lines. Namely the words "cantankerous discord", "palpable" and "eponymous." Otherwise I understood your claim and you proved it well, while giving some solid background information on the band. I say that's perfect, but your verbiage tries to ruin your writing at times.



You just have a habit of being overly descriptive and wordy. Words/phrases like "Droning tedium," repetitive uses of "cantankerous" and "palpable" along with "abhor" and "pugnacious" subtract from the concise portions of your argument - of which much of is very well-written.



It's obvious that you are very intelligent but your review is being dragged down by you trying to hard.

cvlts
March 26th 2010


9943 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

you know, reading this, it doesnt read like a 2.5

Athom
Emeritus
March 26th 2010


17244 Comments


it took me a while to learn this, but anything that you do can be made awkward or damn near unreadable by wordiness. just for future reference, when you are writing/editing only use concise language. every word should be absolutely vital to getting your point across, and if it isn't cut it. an easy way to check for this is to just read whatever it is that you are writing out loud, it helps you catch clunky structure or out of place words.

Plutonio
March 26th 2010


474 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

thanks

Comatorium.
March 26th 2010


5237 Comments


Put down the thesaurus.

Plutonio
March 26th 2010


474 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Edited

joshuatree
Emeritus
March 26th 2010


3744 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i don't understand how people think this is boring idk

rasputin
March 26th 2010


14968 Comments


i havent heard but i agree with cam regardless



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy