Fleetwood Mac
Tusk


3.0
good

Review

by Nagrarok USER (219 Reviews)
July 11th, 2010 | 15 replies


Release Date: 1979 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The inevitable result of Rumours' aftermath.

In the wake of Rumours, Fleetwood Mac was emotionally drained, caused by the turmoil in the relationships within the band. On top of that, they were burdened with following up an album that became an unseen success for them, and eventually a timeless classic. The quintet created Tusk, an album that was ambitious, but inevitably fell short of the expectations set by their preceding magnum opus.

Such is of course no surprise. The compositions on Rumours were amazing, and you'll not find as many on here by a long shot. That said, Tusk is, overall, still a pretty great album. It finds its main flaw in its incoherency: where the compositions of Lindsey Buckingham, Stevie Nicks and Christine McVie felt unified even though they were basically solo compositions, this album really does feel as the solo work of three musicians put together. Lindsey Buckingham takes the lead, not only creating 9 out of the 20 tracks, but also being responsible for a great deal of the production. His contributions, however, are generally the weaker offerings on the record. Buckingham's songs are, unlike his earlier ones, fuzzy and loud, which often enough makes them even slightly annoying. Save Me a Place and That's All for Everyone are certainly not highlights, and the only real high point Buckingham makes is the title track, a unique-sounding song because of the addition of a marching band. On paper, that doesn't seem like it would work, but it certainly does here.

Christine McVie still finds herself in her comfort zone, as opposed to Buckingham. Her straightforward approach to songwriting carries through from the band's earlier records, and most of her songs are pleasurable listens, although you won't find anything of the Don't Stop or You Make Loving Fun-caliber here. The woman who really saves the day for Tusk is unsurprisingly Stevie Nicks, who had already proven to be the strongest writer of the three. Nicks plays her usual strengths, and she plays them well. Despite only appearing as a lead on 5 tracks, these are all among the best on the album, especially the well-known Sara and the often overlooked Storms. Without these, Tusk would barely be passable.

The fact that Tusk has some issues is almost solely the doing of Rumours' aftermath. The album doesn't feel as unified, and the overall songwriting by Buckingham and McVie isn't as focused as it has been. Nevertheless, there is enough here to make the album work just well enough. Fleetwood Mac were having some harsh times, which would in a few years bring them even further down the spiral, but it depends just how much you love this era of Fleetwood Mac. You can shed a forgiving light on Tusk, or you can feel free to critisise it. Both have been done, and it seems right to keep the rating in the middle area, in all objectivity. This is a worthy Fleetwood Mac get, but go with their self-titled, Rumours or Tango in the Night over it.

Mac Classics:

Sara
Storms
Sisters of the Moon
Tusk




Recent reviews by this author
Genesis Calling All StationsGenesis We Can't Dance
Genesis Invisible TouchGenesis Genesis
Genesis AbacabGenesis Duke
user ratings (386)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
Iai EMERITUS (3.5)
The follow-up to Rumours confused many people, but with the benefit of hindsight, it makes perfect s...

Patrick (4)
...

FloydZepp4ever (5)
The world expected "Rumours II," but instead got a melange of Stevie Nicks and Christine McVie tryin...

Drbebop (3.5)
Just say that you want me...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Nagrarok
July 11th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

It was time I continued with Fleetwood Mac.

joshuatree
Emeritus
July 11th 2010


3744 Comments


holy fuck you have 146 reviews

Nagrarok
July 11th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

holy fuck that's true

Rhino
July 11th 2010


71 Comments


Good review Nag. One quibble: "completely unsurprisingly" seems a bit awkward. Probably don't need the first word in there.

AggravatedYeti
July 11th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

.......TUSK!!!!

I agree with you about it's inconsistency compared to 'Rumours' but I still fucking love this album.



review is niiiicceee.

Nagrarok
July 11th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Thanks guys.

Observer
Emeritus
July 11th 2010


9406 Comments


Not sure if you've talked about this yet, but what's in mind for your 150th? (pos)

Nagrarok
July 11th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

No, I haven't talked about it yet, and in fact, I haven't even thought about it yet. Good you mention it. It so happens I'm at 149 when I've dealt with this era of Fleetwood Mac, so that's excellent. I'll probably let it be a surprise.

Voivod
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2010


10750 Comments


Nagrarok you are one mean reviewing machine.

Kudos

joshuatree
Emeritus
July 11th 2010


3744 Comments


"holy fuck that's true"

h5 bro way to be

Jethro42
July 12th 2010


18281 Comments


I'm proud to own their 1992' compilation 'The Chain' (4 cds). There's about half of 'Tusk' that I've never heard...I probably didn't miss much.
Good review Nag, pos'd


BigHans
July 14th 2010


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A STORM.

mallen-
February 19th 2011


1245 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

pretty underwhelmed after s/t and rumours

Nagrarok
February 19th 2011


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Yeah that's what you get.

Jethro42
February 19th 2011


18281 Comments


Couple of fillers here.
Nagrarok's recs rule hard (especially Sara and Storms)
Also Brown Eyes and the sloppy and sweet;
That's alllll for everyonnnnnnne
That's alllll for meeeeeeeeeeeee
Reminds me my teenage's trippy time.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy