Steely Dan
Gaucho


2.0
poor

Review

by TheMoonchild USER (156 Reviews)
August 22nd, 2014 | 20 replies


Release Date: 1980 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Perfection can only get you so far when the music underneath it is so desperately lacking.

It's kind of sad knowing that to date, Steely Dan's only known big achievement to the folks who aren't big, die-hard Dan fans are Aja and Countdown to Ecstasy. Yet at the same time, it's kind of hard to blame the non-believers when said albums are so flawless in every single of the word; while Katy Lied and The Royal Scam are great albums, they aren't as immediately grabbing as you'd expect. And because Aja was so perfect in every sense, a ton of pressure was put on the band to make the ultimate follow up. Problem is; they hadn't been a band in the literal sense for ages, as by this point it was Fagen/Becker with session musicians, and the 70s were approaching their end; their fusion of hard rock and jazz was going to go out of style, with Aja having seen a notable shift into a more commercial sound. And so because they had gone through a revolving door of session musicians, the recording proved to be absolutely apocalyptic; in fact, this album is often seen as the go-to example for a troubled production (well, it and Wilco's Yankee Hotel Foxtrot) share the name). If the Wilco album could be called the Apocalypse Now of album recordings, then this album could be considered Heaven's Gate.

But putting the apocalyptic production aside (speaking of which, read up about the whole fiasco on TvTropes; it's arguably more interesting than the music), Gaucho's big problem isn't so much that it's offensively bad, which it's not, it's that the music here is so painfully bland, soulless and void of emotion that as another user correctly put it, almost feels like an uncanny valley effect. Unlike the band's previous releases, which were raw, unpolished and had a brilliantly quirky sense of humour, this album is ultra-polished, perfect and worst of all, boring. For all the talent appearing on this album, so little of it appears to have been utilized. The songs themselves are too long at 5-6 minutes and seem to run out of ideas at least a minute or two before they reach the end. This is evident right from the first track, "Babylon Sisters"; it's an aimless and plodding tune with an extremely uninteresting jazz beat and a cringe-worthy hook of "Babylon sisters, shake it". Also worth noting are the unnecessary backup singers; the band has never needed them, but here, and on the rest of the album, it seems gratuitous and forced. They aren't given any particularly interesting lyrics to sing either; which doesn't help.

In fact, the only song on here that is even remotely interesting and features anything worth singing to home about is "Hey Nineteen", where the band attempt to do something with this newer and more polished sound. For the most part, it works. The change of key in the chorus works to the song's advantage, and even the song proudly embracing its simplistic 4/4 beat isn't bad either. Mind you, it isn't an amazing song and it does fall prey to being a minute too long, but it works for the most part. Sadly, the songs surrounding it just aren't interesting enough to justify all the polish. The most glaring example of a song threatening to get interesting, but then being ruined by a specific part that pushes the simplistic nature front and center is "My Rival". It's a funkier and slower tune that promises to be great and an instant classic, at least in the verses. But then a lame keyboard part comes in and spoils it all. Too much of the album feels like the soundtrack to a 1980s cruise liner safety video too; the saxophones here, where minimal on previous albums, are in all of the tracks, and if I hadn't known better, I'd have expected the "sexy sax guy" from Youtube to come in and begin playing "Careless Whisper". The musicians themselves appear to be phoning in their performances, which only makes Fagen's already rather uncharismatic voice (which worked on previous albums thanks to the fiery music) even more boring.

Of course, hearing this album's final product, it's not hard to see why the band broke up not long after its release. This album may be clean of imperfections, but sadly, it's also clean of humanity, emotion and feeling. Whereas the band's other releases were rough around the edges and unpolished, they were fun to listen to and full of energy. Sadly this is the sound of a band tired, under pressure from all the troubles surrounding its production going through the motions. Thankfully, the band returned to greatness when they reunited in 1995 and the resulting album Two Against Nature showed the band finally being given the kick they needed to five us some funky and rocking music.



Recent reviews by this author
Bruce Dickinson The Mandrake ProjectLana Del Rey Chemtrails Over The Country Club
System of a Down Protect The Land/Genocidal HumanoidzSteven Wilson The Future Bites
Sub Urban Thrill SeekerIron Maiden Nights of the Dead: Live in Mexico City
user ratings (250)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
Brendan Schroer STAFF (4)
A bizarrely compelling death rattle....

Beware NO TWINKCORE here, real metal only goddamnit! (they/she) (5)
"It's perfection and grace. It's the smile on my face"...

Drbebop (3.5)
The end of a perfect day...

TheCount (2)
Music's uncanny valley...



Comments:Add a Comment 
TheMoonchild
August 22nd 2014


1315 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Bought all the remasters and listened to them last week; I have just as much trouble listening to Gaucho now as I did back when I was little.

Jots
Emeritus
August 22nd 2014


7562 Comments


Good review, needs a quick proofread (edit your last sentence) but I enjoyed reading this. Pos

TheMoonchild
August 22nd 2014


1315 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Fixed

PappyMason
August 22nd 2014


5702 Comments


Good review, man. I haven't listened to this in a long, long time. The greatness of Dan's other releases may have purged this from my memory. Need to re-listen.

Minor correction, in the second paragraph you're missing a m off minutes -'songs themselves are too long at 5-6. Inutes'

TheMoonchild
August 22nd 2014


1315 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah fucking predictive text. Will fix it



TwigTW
August 22nd 2014


3934 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Every Steely Dan album is better than the last--until this one. I like some of the songs (Third World Man, Hey Nineteen, and the title track), but listening to the whole album is disappointing. You are right about the song lengths. They are all too long.

menawati
August 22nd 2014


16719 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

nice review, yeah they dropped on this one

MO
August 22nd 2014


24040 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

love steely dan, but I have always found this album a little stale



all about pretzel logic mawfuckas

Underflow
August 22nd 2014


5297 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Completely disagree, but solid review.

MO
August 22nd 2014


24040 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this is definitely one of their best sounding albums in terms of production. but I think they tried to do too much following in Aja's footsteps in that regard that the songwriting is almost not here

Drpibb
August 22nd 2014


192 Comments


"Yet at the same time, it's kind of hard to blame the non-believers when said albums are so flawless in every single of the word"

I think you accidentally a word.

"Problem is; they hadn't been a band in the literal sense for ages, as by this point it was Fagen/Becker with session musicians, and the 70s were approaching their end; their fusion of hard rock and jazz was going to go out of style, with Aja having seen a notable shift into a more commercial sound. "

Should be a colon, not a semi. Check your use of tense. The second half of the statement could be its own sentence.

'The problem was Steely Dan hadn't been a band, in the literal sense, for ages. By that point [insert year or more precise time] it was Fagen and Becker accompanied by session musicians, when the 70s were approaching their end. The band's fusion of hard rock and jazz was going out of style, especially with Aja seeing a notable shift towards a more commercial sound.'

I would still advise to revise the paragraphs more. Proofreading would be a good step in the editing process.

RunOfTheMill
August 22nd 2014


4515 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

oh wow lol



well, good review, no doubt... but I really disagree haha

KILL
August 22nd 2014


81580 Comments


2 2 reviews damn

DrJohn
August 22nd 2014


1041 Comments


Far from great yet not as bad as you rate it, nonetheless props for reviewing it.

AnimalsAsSummit
December 23rd 2018


6178 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

can't believe how low you people rate this. this is like the pop/rock equivalent to Sun Ra. space music.

CynicalComplex
January 9th 2019


120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Just like space, completely vapid.

TheLongShot
January 9th 2019


865 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not necessarily vapid, but most certainly sterile.

AnimalsAsSummit
January 10th 2019


6178 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

neither.



soulful. beautiful. otherworldly.

TheLongShot
January 10th 2019


865 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Plastic soulful

xxm
December 21st 2020


257 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This is a great fucking album.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy