Rush
Snakes & Arrows


4.0
excellent

Review

by Hokeyboy USER (9 Reviews)
March 25th, 2015 | 5 replies


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Arguably the finest album of their later era, SNAKES & ARROWS features Rush at their most emotionally guttural but with a strong focus on musicality, fidelity, and tonal diversity.

Producer Nick Raskulinecz lobbied hard to work with Rush on their 2007 album SNAKES & ARROWS, and the result is probably one of the strongest (if not THE strongest) album of the band’s later period. Ostensibly Raskulinecz was working to return Rush to their experimental, progressive heyday of the 2112 through Hemispheres era, although I don’t think that’s an apt descriptor of the album. For starters, Rush was never a band that spent significant (if any) time looking backward. Whether you liked the direction the band was taking or not, you could never dismiss Rush for remaining stagnant or coasting on formula. This is compounded by the fact that SNAKES & ARROWS lacks the epic progressive pieces that earmark those earlier albums, in favor of a record that featured 13 tracks of standard song lengths (four to six minutes), including three instrumentals.

So yeah, it’d be misleading to assert that SNAKES & ARROWS contains the lyrical and musical equivalent of “Cygnus X-1 III: Attack of the Mole People” or whatever. But what it does feature is a band still mining its creative peak. If anything, there seems to be an air of freedom here, a lack of self-consciousness that all too often plagues established, successful bands well into their fourth decade of recording and touring. Nowhere on the album does it feel like anyone is bellowing “We need a few CLASSIC RUSH SONGS here!!” This is a Rush album, no question, but it’s an album that showcases a band in measured motion and disciplined exploration. SNAKES & ARROWS feels a little long but it never wallows in meandering self-indulgence or pointless fan-service.

The album’s central focus is faith, its application or sublimation, the wake left behind in its practice, and the reconciliation between dauntless hope and stark pragmatism. Or something like that. Drummer Neil Peart’s lyrics seem to resonate around a central pillar of struggle, conflict, and being able to shoulder the burden while maintaining forward motion. Whether it’s being able to pick yourself up after being continually knocked down (“Far Cry”), navigating through the calamitous thicket of existence while dodging disaster at every turn (“Working Them Angels”), appreciating the beauty of life while recognizing its cynical paradoxes and uncaring destructiveness (“Bravest Face”), finding hope in the face of a universe striving for disorder (“Good News First”), or even a blanket declaration of Humanist principles (“Faithless”), this is Peart at his starkest, darkest, but yet most determined perseverance.

Musically, the band seems especially focused and economical. While there are the usual flourishes of technical and progressive complexity we’ve come to expect from Rush, none of it exists in a vacuum; all of it exists in service of the songs, first and foremost. The hard rock crunch of “Far Cry” merges seamlessly with the pop-rock catchiness of its chorus. The exotic instrumental “The Main Monkey Business” is evocative of island/Afro-Caribbean beats and Middle Eastern melodies to provide something entirely unique, haunting, and lovely. Then you have something like “The Larger Bowl”, in which Geddy Lee’s heartfelt, almost folksy vocals are intertwined seamlessly with a strong acoustic backbone provided by Alex Lifeson.

There’s a prevailing mood of versatility and verisimilitude on SNAKES & ARROWS. An issue I have with some later-era Rush albums is that there is an overall feeling of sameness to the songs on each record (witness 2012’s Clockwork Angels, which is a rather good album but lacks variety), but that’s not the case here. While songs are thematically similar, each exists in its own style and space while simultaneously becoming part of cohesive and appealing collective. Take the three instrumental songs (“The Main Monkey Business”, “Hope”, and “Malignant Narcissism”), which are all distinct pieces: I previously discussed the exotic, worldly “Monkey”, whereas the acoustic “Hope” focuses on a bluegrass feel, with “Narcissism” a more traditional prog-hard-rock track, yet they seem to springboard off of and into each other. As an exploration of faith, its antecedents and conditionals, the album runs the spectral gamut, from rocking hard with furious rage to softening with introspective meditation, sometimes both at the same time. SNAKES & ARROWS is Rush at their most personal, most connective, most emotionally guttural (as emotionally guttural as Rush gets, anyhow), but still with a strong focus on musicality (complexity in service of melody), fidelity (this is a great sounding record) and tonal diversity.



Recent reviews by this author
KISS Rock and Roll OverRush Signals
Rush Fly by NightRush Grace Under Pressure
Thin Lizzy Vagabonds of the Western WorldThin Lizzy Black Rose: A Rock Legend
user ratings (1048)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Brendan Schroer STAFF (4.5)
...

JohnXDoesn't (3.5)
Neil Peart and Rush make a welcome return from having one foot in the grave and sound like a band wi...

jimay333 (4)
A solid release by a solid band....

diddy (3.5)
While it's not one of their classic albums, it's a new style and I like the new direction that Rush ...



Comments:Add a Comment 
bnelso55
March 25th 2015


1447 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Solid review. You got my vote. I really like this album and agree with your statement that it is "probably one of the strongest (if not THE strongest) album of the band’s later period".



One thing I noted in the review:



There’s a prevailing mood of versatility and verisimilitude (??) SNAKES & ARROWS.



^Did you mean to have an "on" here?

Hokeyboy
March 25th 2015


6 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks for the kind words bnelso55 (and the head's up on the typo, now fixed). I really love this album; I think it stands out as one of the band's best albums, period.

bnelso55
March 25th 2015


1447 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Definitely. Sometimes I find myself coming back to this one more often than some of their "classic" era material.*ducks*

There isn't a bad Rush album really, but this one noteworthy.

KILL
March 25th 2015


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

good review and record but they played it kinda safe, apart from the opener and the instrumentals theres not much jamming, album becomes a bit of a slog in the middle to end but its saved by we hold on which rocks



they stepped up their game hard with clockwork

Hokeyboy
March 25th 2015


6 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks KILL. I actually prefer the less jamming/more song-focused orientation of S&A, but that's just me.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy