Mumford and Sons
Wilder Mind


2.5
average

Review

by Jordan M. EMERITUS
May 4th, 2015 | 34 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Now with Denim and Leather!

It's a platitude that bears repeating: Indie rock has changed dramatically since Mumford & Sons last bored us to the insufferable tune of Babel. At the time, floor toms and instruments that kind of looked like guitars but weren't were all the rage, and it seemed as if every label wanted their own goatee-clad, faux-folk rockers. Nowadays, the likes of American Authors hold the mantle, somehow further watering down a concept in itself so loose that you're left to wonder what integrity was there to be washed out in the first place. Mumford & Sons have seen the consequence and happily redacted much of their persona ("We looked like absolute idiots."), now mincing around in skinny jeans to the sound of U2-sized anthems. Predictably, the superficial changes have done little to elevate already tiring songwriting.

Of course, Mumford & Sons' tepid songwriting has never been their worst quality; it's been their propensity for suspenders and put-on London brogues. Changing into a leather jacket and ill-fitting jeans therefore alleviates only some issues for the band's already tiring formula. While lead single "Believe" would imply that they've merely opted for beige theatrics in the vein of Coldplay, the genesis of Wilder Mind lies more in the literate and confessional ilk of The National and Sufjan Stevens. It's certainly welcome that Marc Mumford would trade insipid melodies and banjo plucks for opulence and electricity, but far too often does Wilder Mind fall into stadium rock cliché. Despite claims from both the band and the NME that the change would be so radical as to alienate a large portion of their fans, Wilder Mind is just a lateral move that serves to prove that Mumford & Sons have always been boring songwriters no matter how they dress. Wilder experimentation is forsaken in favour of stadium tropes already done better by Arcade Fire; that being said, it's probably for the best that we miss out on Mumford spitting bars over a 10-minute heavy metal rifforama. Wilder Mind's undeniable highlight though stands as "The Wolf", a competent enough attempt at hard rock that will likely be forgotten when it comes to live shows and compilations. Instead, Wilder Mind is crammed to the brim with tracks such as "Snake Eyes" and "Broad-Shouldered Beasts", unoriginal stadium anthems that sound akin to Adam Granduciel in a more uninspired moment.

Critics will attempt to categorize Wilder Mind as the album for people who don't like Mumford & Sons; that's simply not true. Even if it's got a fresh lick of paint, the wallpaper does little to hide the fact that Mumford & Sons don't write impressive songs. There's nothing new or innovative to behold, because in the end, Wilder Mind is just the sound of a terrible band becoming an average one. It doesn't encourage the same introversion High Violet manages, nor does it evoke nostalgia quite like Lost in the Dream. What it does is float indifferently above a cesspool of already disinteresting ideas while wearing designer apparel. Then again, maybe this sort of bilge looks alright in denim and leather.



Recent reviews by this author
Sheck Wes MudboyTravis Scott Astroworld
Denzel Curry TA13OOPusha T DAYTONA
Post Malone beerbongs and bentleysJ. Cole K.O.D.
user ratings (273)
2.3
average
other reviews of this album
1 of
related reviews

Sigh No More

Babel

Delta


Comments:Add a Comment 
Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 4th 2015


70242 Comments


bet this is just as good (read 'not good') as the new sufjan and mountain goats

Jots
Emeritus
May 4th 2015


7562 Comments


(edit: fixed)

"At the time, floor toms and instruments that kind of looked like guitars but weren't were all the rage, and it seemed as if every label wanted their own goatee-clad, faux-folk rockers"
- something about this reads weird

- - - - -

prefer your slightly longer review style, wasn't as into the one-para blurbs so much. nicely done. will give an actual thorough read in a bit


Jots
Emeritus
May 4th 2015


7562 Comments


maybe it's a sentence fragment thing, idk lol

Jots
Emeritus
May 4th 2015


7562 Comments


i think it's the "at the time [...] and it seemed" thing. like, it doesn't feel like a complete sentence or something

VaxXi
May 4th 2015


4418 Comments


Well this album doesn't make me want to bash my head into a wall like their last two, so thats a plus.

trackbytrackreviews
May 4th 2015


3469 Comments


+ No Banjo

- NO BANJO

SPRFanOf5H
May 4th 2015


874 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

that album cover sure is nice

Sowing
Moderator
May 4th 2015


43955 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Well you beat me to the review, that's for sure. Review isn't bad at all, earned a mental pos from me.



I have a feeling that a lot of people will be surprised by how much they like this.

Sowing
Moderator
May 4th 2015


43955 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I always thought these guys got a little more hate than they deserve on this site, but I do understand where the nausea stems from.

Tunaboy45
May 4th 2015


18429 Comments


Surprise surprise

Pangea
May 4th 2015


10541 Comments


This is probably like a 3 or something

Sowing
Moderator
May 4th 2015


43955 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm working on my review for this and right now I can't decide if this is par for their course (which is normally ~3 for me) or worse than their banjo music (would be a 2.5 probably). It's hard to write a review while you're still trying to decide what you think of the album. If I can't come to a clear decision by Wed/Thurs I'll ask Jom if he can feature this. I'm loving Tompkins Square Park, The Wolf, Just Smoke, and Broad Shouldered Beasts right now. At least half of the album hasn't made an impression on me either way though, so I'm waiting to either tire of them or have them click. Something's gotta give.

oahmed
May 4th 2015


81 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Probably between a 2.5 to 3 for me. Some of the songs are decent, but I cringe when I hear The Wolf.

emester
May 4th 2015


8271 Comments


Always had a soft spot for these guys for some odd reason. A bit of a guilty pleasure, if you would

JWT155
May 4th 2015


14957 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Genuinely intrigued how this turns out.

brandaao
May 4th 2015


248 Comments


I'm on my second run through the record and i'm actually digging this way more than I thought I would. Some songs has a certain "The National" kind of vibe that I'm enjoying. Even "Believe", which I thought was really generic when I first heard it fits well within the context of the record. I think this is waay better than their indie-hipster-folk.

DoofusWainwright
May 4th 2015


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

A National sorta vibe?! Give this man 20 lashes

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 4th 2015


70242 Comments


bet this shreds tbh

DoofusWainwright
May 4th 2015


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Define 'shreds'

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 4th 2015


70242 Comments


brings the riffs



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy