Radiohead
Amnesiac


3.5
great

Review

by IAMSOEPIC USER (3 Reviews)
January 24th, 2016 | 13 replies


Release Date: 2001 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Quality aside, the questionable sequencing of Amnesiac does little to hush the argument that the record is merely a thinly veiled b-sides compilation.

Faced with a deliberately difficult deviation into "experimentation," Radiohead and their record label promoted Kid A as just that -- a brave experiment, and that the next album, which was just around the corner, really, would be the "real" record, the one to satiate fans looking for the next OK Computer, or at least guitars. At the time, people bought the myth, especially since live favorites like "Knives Out" and "You and Whose Army?" were nowhere to be seen on Kid A. That, however, ignores a salient point -- Amnesiac, as the album came to be known, consists of recordings made during the Kid A sessions, so it essentially sounds the same.

Since Radiohead designed Kid A as a self-consciously epochal, genre-shattering record, the songs that didn't make the cut were a little simpler, so it shouldn't be a surprise that Amnesiac plays like a streamlined version of Kid A, complete with blatant electronica moves and production that sacrifices songs for atmosphere. This, inevitably, will disappoint the legions awaiting another guitar-based record (that is, after all, what they were explicitly promised), but what were they expecting? This is an album recorded at the same time and Radiohead have a certain reputation to uphold.

It would be easier to accept this if the record was better than it is. Where Kid A had shock on its side, along with an admirably dogged desire to not be conventional, Amnesiac often plays as a hodgepodge. True, it's a hodgepodge with amazing moments: the hypnotic sway of "Pyramid Song" and "You and Whose Army?," the swirling "I Might Be Wrong," "Knives Out," and the spectacular closer "Life in a Glasshouse," complete with a drunkenly swooning brass band. But, these are not moments that are markedly different than Kid A, which itself lost momentum as it sputtered to a close. And this is the main problem -- though it's nice for an artist to be generous and release two albums, these two records clearly derive from the same source and have the same flaws, which clearly would have been corrected if they had been consolidated into one record.

Instead of revealing why the two records were separated, the appearance of Amnesiac makes the separation seem arbitrary -- there's no shift in tone, no shift in approach, and the division only makes the two records seem unfocused, even if the best of both records is quite stunning, proof positive that Radiohead are one of the best bands of their time.


user ratings (5059)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Tunaboy45
January 24th 2016


18616 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

dank

IAMSOEPIC
January 24th 2016


11 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Two comments? So quickly? xD

YetAnotherBrick
January 24th 2016


6693 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it's not a hodgepodge, it's Radiohead being Radiohead in an even more daring way than on Kid A. alright review tho

IAMSOEPIC
January 24th 2016


11 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Thanks, anyway. But in general, i think this album is overrated.

Tyler.
January 24th 2016


19033 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

morning bell off this rocks

climactic
January 24th 2016


22765 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

not really a review, just a comparison piece. its well written, but you almost never talk about the album on its own merits. i dont really understand how you can say "it essentially sounds the same," either. it may have been recorded in the same sessions, but almost none of the songs here would fit in on kid a at all. what if these songs were recorded at a completely different time and it had no connection at all to kid A? thats the album you should be reviewing

DoofusWainwright
January 24th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

At the time this dropped it did really feel like a B-Sides/off cuts collection

claygurnz
January 24th 2016


7689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Great album, underrated imo.

Judio!
January 24th 2016


8501 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

iamsoepic

ArsMoriendi
January 24th 2016


41567 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Is this shit on Amnesiac week or what?

tommygun
January 24th 2016


27117 Comments


review is shite album rules

Mort.
January 24th 2016


26135 Comments


generally bruv the rule is ony one review on the frontpage at a time yah

IAMSOEPIC
January 25th 2016


11 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm not saying it's shitty. I'm just saying it's overrated. And sorry, i'm new to the site, i don't know the rules.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy