Swans
The Glowing Man


2.5
average

Review

by BibiloBombus USER (6 Reviews)
June 18th, 2016 | 16 replies


Release Date: 2016 | Tracklist

Review Summary: "This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper."

Listening to post-reunion Swans is a lot like reading a Where’s Waldo book. A colorful, two-page spread of rock music is presented before you. Everything appears to be identical, and you start to think, “How many people in this ballroom are wearing a goddamn red-and-white striped pullover?!”

And then you find Waldo. All is well. “Oh, I get it now! I rate this book 4.5 stars!”

The Glowing Man is a Where’s Waldo book without Waldo. Yes, the album still has all the trademark post-rock crescendos and Glenn Branca-esque noise you’ve come to expect from the group– in fact, I would argue that these components are painstakingly turned up to 11. With this, however, the album is lacking what made Swans’ past few releases so entertaining: conviction.

The first two tracks are actually quite good. In the first, descending piano scales juxtapose gritty new wave soundscapes, creating something deliciously apocalyptic. The second track is the logical conclusion to this iteration of Swans’ we’ve been waiting for, with the slower, folkier moments seamlessly weaving themselves in with repetitive, pounding guitar chords. Back-to-back, these two tracks are Swans’ most fully-realized musical rupture since Soundtracks For The Blind. Unfortunately, as is the case for many long-running rock acts, any given track’s emotional impact is dampened by the group’s own hackneyed idiosyncrasies. Yes, it’s interesting, but in the end, it’s just another Swans song.

The title track is presumably the album’s focal point, but in it lies the main problem with much of the album– it’s incredibly boring. What made To Be Kind so entertaining was it’s no-holds-barred approach to songwriting, where guitar riffs gleefully and effectively overstayed their welcome. In contrast Gira seems to be less confident in the strength of the songs on The Glowing Man, as is evidenced by the cheap and plentiful dynamic changes (i.e. an over-reliance on “surprise” guitar chords) scattered throughout this 3LP. "Frankie M" is occasionally effective, but ends up sounding like an elderly man’s amateur attempt at acid rock, most notably during the awkward transition towards the middle. Meanwhile, the title track is a promising barrage of ideas that ultimately result in an epic pile of mush. Waldo is dead and we killed him.

Many fans will interpret this album's outward expressions of artistic frustration as a new standard of sonic intensity. For this reason I can’t help but feel like this was a wasted opportunity. Aside from the first two tracks, Swans’ latest effort is a stale amalgamation of contrived neofolk and tired attempts at post-rock that lasts for an hour longer than it should. If this is the last we hear from the legendary Swans, I will be sorely disappointed.



Recent reviews by this author
maudlin of the Well BathDeerhunter Microcastle
Death Grips The Powers That B - Part I: Niggas on the MoonDean Blunt Black Metal
Ariel Pink Pom Pom
user ratings (723)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
ParkerDesautell1 (4)
Swans' latest album is a diverse offering of blues, post-rock and drone minimalism that finds the gr...

CaptainAaarrrggghhh (4)
Being kind to the blind...



Comments:Add a Comment 
TVC15
June 18th 2016


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not a bad review. The mixed reception for this is fascinating

Gyromania
June 18th 2016


37155 Comments


good review. i didn't end up making it through this album, it was just way too tedious

insomniac15
Staff Reviewer
June 18th 2016


6191 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The album is really cool, but too much to listen in one take.

RadicalEd
June 18th 2016


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Ended up very far up their own asses with this one.

Comatorium.
June 18th 2016


5062 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I've never gotten Swans and it looks like this won't change anything.

climactic
June 18th 2016


22743 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nah it ruls

eddie95
June 18th 2016


708 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

album is solid imo, a bit weaker than To Be Kind and The Seer but great nonetheless. If one thing, I agree that they should change the "album format", stilistically speaking and varying a little the duration.

Supercoolguy64
June 18th 2016


11797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

def the weakest of the post-reuinion double disc trilogy

BandNewbac
June 19th 2016


2462 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

good rev

BandNewbac
June 19th 2016


2462 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

i understand why this is getting mixed reception, it just sounds very recycled in a lot of places. its still decent, but the fresh ideas are too few and far between for me to enjoy this as much as something like the seer when it first came out.



For example i like the idea of repeating yourself in music if it thematically works. but in the glowing man the entire section after the bring the sun reboot is just the exact same crashing instrumentation we have heard too many times from swans at this point and it just kinda makes me roll my eyes. there's a lot of good here, but there's just too much shit to trawl through to get to it.

CaptainAaarrrggghhh
June 19th 2016


432 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Disagree but extremely well put. Pos'd.

Supercoolguy64
June 19th 2016


11797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

butterfly....

someguest
June 19th 2016


30126 Comments


Listening to post-reunion Swans is a lot like reading a Where’s Waldo book. A colorful, two-page spread of rock music is presented before you. Everything appears to be identical, and you start to think, “How many people in this ballroom are wearing a goddamn red-and-white striped pullover?!”

And then you find Waldo. All is well. “Oh, I get it now! I rate this book 4.5 stars!”


Funniest intro I've read in a minute.

JasonCarne
June 22nd 2016


1184 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah, this album kinda sucks, and I love a lot of their albums.

GooGooGajoob
October 20th 2018


236 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This review and opinion has not aged well...

P0laris
March 28th 2019


383 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Nah, the review rocks, even if I completely disagree with the sentiment.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy