Bring Me The Horizon
Music to Listen to...


4.0
excellent

Review

by LloydTao USER (1 Reviews)
December 30th, 2019 | 17 replies


Release Date: 2019 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This ambitious endeavour into electronic avant-gardism is begging for us to give it meaning, and within this lies the true power of 'Music to listen to~'.

Bring Me The Horizon may have polarised fans with amo, but regardless of how audiences received it, the release achieved one thing: it pioneered the band's exploration into the experimental.

Now, in this bizarrely titled EP, the British rock group serves us an unsettling extension of the journey that amo started. The group have quite obviously indulged in the extra creative breathing-room offered by an EP, and with this, their newest release is different; it is devoid of structure or identity.

This does not make it a bad release. It also does not make it special.

'Music to listen to~' must be judged both independently of what we expect from a well-established artist, yet irrespectively of its commercial context. And it's a pleasure.

---

The record is quick to cement its recurring themes; after introducing itself with gentle ambiance, it proceeds to interrupt itself with a more sustenant beat, and from this point, tracks begin to spontaneously and erratically break apart. Drastic changes in its atmosphere make individual tracks feel like three.

We quickly learn that this record is attempting to offer us a listening experience through sonic environments that poke at the listener's mind instead of absorbing it, as if we're a nomad migrating through a continent of rapidly-changing climate. The listener is not lost in the music; the music is lost within the listener.

It's begging for us to give it meaning, and within this lies the true power of 'Music to listen to~'.

This EP is a reminder that Bring Me The Horizon are first-and-foremost not a metalcore band, or an electronic band, or even an alternative band; they are pure artists. Experimental music is volatile, and as such, acts as a trial of the elasticity of an artist. As proven in this release, the band possesses an implicit ability to generate sounds that manipulate emotion, and further, can beautifully produce tracks in any genre or mood that they desire.

In spite of this, the EP does have flaws.

Underground Big {HEADFULOFHYENA} attempts to project its musical intimacy through the same use of repetition that the other tracks successfully experiment with, but by doing this for over 19 minutes, is far too abstract to offer any value in its listening experience. Within the same track, a monologue from frontman Oli Sykes begins to make the track political.*

Activists and free-thinkers are prone to believing that their personal philosophies transcend politics, due to failing to realise that individuals can see a bigger picture as a result of differing values. Through the use of opinions on classism, veganism and theism, Oli's ignorance in the same regard leads to destroying the surrealism, and by extension, the suspension of the human ego that the record tried so hard to create. It's a shame.

Additionally, the opening track Steal Something. is lacking that same ambition that the other tracks possess. The opener appears to act as a 'bridge' between amo and 'Music to listen to~' rather than as an introduction to the EP itself and, as such, once the record loops back to the start, it sounds a little boring in contrast.

Regardless, these flaws do not detract from the musical excellency of the record as a whole. I struggle to listen to a single track from this record without being persuaded into listening to the EP in its entirety.

---

The group's ambitious endeavour into avant-gardism and the meta-experimental is successful and well-realised, and although its attempt at postmodernism is premature, this flaw in the album's philosophy does not detract from the engaging and endearing execution of sound and production.

Music to listen to~dance to~blaze to~pray to~feed to~sleep to~talk to~grind to~trip to~breathe to~help to~hurt to~scroll to~roll to~love to~hate to~learn Too~plot to~play to~be to~feel to~breed to~sweat to~dream to~hide to~live to~die to~GO TO earns a 4.0/5.0.


user ratings (295)
1.9
poor
other reviews of this album
step aside Charli XCX there is a new phrase and its Magdalena Bay Fall. ?Imaginal Disk? is the sophomore record from duo Magdalena Bay STAFF (1)
“We’re not going to do an album again, maybe ever. We’re thinking about doing shorter records...

Simon K. STAFF (1.5)
A drunken joke the band may well regret....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Aerisavion
December 30th 2019


3158 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Ok whos alt is this fess up

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
December 30th 2019


62500 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5 | Sound Off

This is the best late Christmas present ever thank you thank you thank you herzlichen Dank grazie mille 本当にありがとう < 3

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
December 30th 2019


10453 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I enjoyed this review, thank you.

botb
December 30th 2019


18424 Comments


“ This EP is a reminder that Bring Me The Horizon are first-and-foremost not a metalcore band, or an electronic band, or even an alternative band; they are pure artists. ”

Lmfao pos

Snake.
December 30th 2019


25389 Comments


neg’d so hard

don’t bring this type of toxicity into the new decade pls

Drbebop
December 30th 2019


333 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It was ok. Pos

Veldin
January 1st 2020


5418 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Too much effort for a joke

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
January 1st 2020


18262 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

the release achieved one thing: it pioneered the band's exploration into the experimental.




um. ummmm.

Aerisavion
January 1st 2020


3158 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

“the release achieved one thing: it pioneered the band's exploration into the experimental.”



If the phrase “bring me that horizon” was ever to imply a “pioneering exploration” - something that the band has done many times throughout their career - then this is undoubtably the album that shipwrecks this motherfucker.

notagenius
January 2nd 2020


1258 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

the only review of this record which is written with a sound mind.

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
January 2nd 2020


62500 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5 | Sound Off

a galaxy brain

Aerisavion
January 2nd 2020


3158 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

“the only review of this record which is written with a sound mind.“



Yes. It certainly is a recording of sound.



A painfully messy bash-your-head-into-a-wall-repeatedly kind of sound.

notagenius
January 2nd 2020


1258 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

okay, may be i should not use the word "sound mind".

the other two reviews' opinions are way too conservative. it passes the opinion of being stable with what you are good at, don't be ridiculous of doing new. both of them punched it like it is a LP release.



the direction you look at stuff decides your understanding, then further deciding the development path. the EP needs an opinion from another direction looking at it on sputnik to balance out.



I am on the side of allowing funny and experimental happen on EPs. EP is not that serious anyway. there can be full of flaws but this one shows the raw process to the world which can be an encouraging thing. it is a fun and honest interaction. Most bands don't do that, most band keep that distance.



maybe some kiddies get their ableton 30 days trial because of this one. don't joke about it.





JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
January 2nd 2020


62500 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5 | Sound Off

Ah aight, I get you. I agree outright that it's good to see different opinions represented for releases as broadly panned as this (esp. if they're content like your comment; not so much this glorious review) and also that artists developing their sound and leaving their comfort zone shouldn't be written off out of hand - music would get pretty dull otherwise!

I think the gist of both my review and (particularly) Gonzo's was less that BMTH should never have tried their hand at the styles at work here and more that they made a terrible job of it. Gonzo's whole second paragraph is pretty pro-experimentation and pro-change, and I second his take there. Personally, I found the 'funny and experimental' side pretty fascinating even though I think the content is dross and tried to reflect as much in my review.

'it is a fun and honest interaction. Most bands don't do that, most band keep that distance.'

V fair point. My line on this is somewhat more flippant than yours because I think the EP is dismally crafted in a way that's undignified for professional musicians, joke or not (think I gave a few specific examples), and also because the spoken word sections often seemed too earnest to write off as dumb fun - the honest and fun elements are at odds with one another imo

'maybe some kiddies get their ableton 30 days trial because of this one. don't joke about it.'

Think you might have called my bluff here, because my line on this is pretty conservative I guess. From my experience listening to and attempting to make music, I don't believe the world is improved by anything-goes content like this, and find the thought of releases like this being taken as sources of inspiration pretty depressing - but if those kids want to kickstart a few bedroom projects, who's to stop them

Sorry for the bombardment, don't want to shut any of your points down - just glad to see some good discussion on this ;]

Jim1
January 2nd 2020


39 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Wow

notagenius
January 2nd 2020


1258 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

@JohnnyoftheWell

thanks for reply Johnny. I also get you.



You consider it very solemnly, and you look forward to it with an expectation as listening to high-quality music. which is, of course, reasonable expectation. but not necessary to be the intention of this release.



your evaluation: it is music. they are musicians. this is poor music

my evaluation: they are some artistic attempts by audio signal. they are artists. it is a loosen form crossover, not great but acceptable encouraging



that's the main gap which leads to the our disagreement.



for example, in the ultra-long track UNDERGROUND BIG, Oli Sykes shitted himself a lot, and ending up with "Focus on what you want". instead of let this kinda chicken soup appear on whatsoever magazine interview, he left it on the tail part of a ridiculous long drunk talk alike track. you can consider it as shit music go skip it. I consider it as decent thought, great humbleness and a sense of insecurity in drunk words wrapped in a vulgar form. I am not arguing this is masterpiece because it is not, but I will definitely defend some of the unpolished quality and wild personality of this band. it is anything but ordinary.



this EP shows lots of artistic in a raw form, you mentioned it as half-baked. maybe some of them will be developed. some of them will be GG immediately. but happy to be informed that they tried a lot by listening to it. fun to know. maybe it works like documentary. I realized you are super serious about the release while I am definitely not, no one was expecting it, so I was also assuming that the band didn't tend to upset anyone by this playful release.



anyway, a surprise release at the end of the decade. can be valuable if you see it from another perspective. that is my argument.

Aerisavion
January 7th 2020


3158 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

“This review is a perfect example of people negging not because the review is poorly written.”



Disagree. The structure here is, to be blunt, pretty all over the place. The most obvious example is the sporadic use of 10+ very short paragraph statements, instead of 5 to 6 larger paragraphs that competently include the desired points of the review.



There ARE some good statements here and there:

“We quickly learn that this record is attempting to offer us a listening experience through sonic environments that poke at the listener's mind...” “...as if we're a nomad migrating through a continent of rapidly-changing climate.”

You know what? That’s actually a pretty thought provoking image.



Or:

“Experimental music is volatile, and as such, acts as a trial of the elasticity of an artist.”

100% true. To experiment is to allow massive amounts of error to appear where there is usually none.



But then there are the odd statements that seem to have been added for nothing more than pure dramatic flair:

“the release achieved one thing: it pioneered the band's exploration into the experimental.”

BMTH have ALWAYS been experimental, with ‘There Is A Hell....’ being the obvious tipping point. There is so much MORE to that album than any of this bullshit. Amo didn’t pioneer experimentation, it was the RESULT of experimentation.



Just because people dislike an album, it doesn’t mean a witch-hunt is in order for those that defend it, sometimes the rushed defence needs fine tuning first.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy